The day was spent at Kings manor making sure that the records which were taken whilst on site were complete and that all the paperwork was accurate. Therefore the morning was spent making sure that the photo numbers matched the context numbers and that all the relevant information was written on the plans of the context.
Once the records were accurate the context sheets which held all the relevant data for the trench were ordered to form a matrix of our trench. The matrix shows the layers which are removed during the excavation and the order in which the sequences occurred. Therefore the topsoil is at the top and in the case of the antiquarian trench the following would be the backfill of the antiquarian trench then the cut of the antiquarian trench. As the cut of the trench is required to be done before it can be filled in.
The afternoon was spent making sure our plans of the trench all fit together and was placed on one big sheet of paper.
Once this was done we then were given the task of why we thought what we had in our trench was what we thought it was. Such as why the robbers hole is not the same as the postholes. The postholes were pretty much near perfect circles or rectangles and were all in the range of 30- 40 cm deep and had steep sides which would suggest the ability to hold some sort of structure on the cobbled surface. Whereas, the robbers hole appears in the middle of a wall and not on the cobbled surface and isn’t as deep as the other postholes. The shape of the robbers hole is irregular and therefore not designed to hold a post and therefore is likely to be something separate from the postholes.
We also had to explain why we thought that we may have a blacksmiths. This idea was supported not only by the numerus nails we found and a horse shoe but within the structure there was evidence of a hearth from burning. There was also pervious knowledge that our side of the Roman road was commercial and that housing was on the other side and therefore supports the idea that we had a blacksmiths.
The day was once again spent at Kings manor, however, today was spent cleaning finds from Malton.
As finds were bagged up by type, such as pottery, tile or bone, and the context they were found in each bag of finds had to placed in a tray with the context number they were found in once cleaned. This is to ensure that when the finds are dated they can be linked to the location they were found and therefore date the context.
This can be applied to the coins which were found in our site which can be dated to the 3rd century, 201 to 300 AD, and therefore the context in which they were found.
The day was spent cleaning pottery from the site in order for them to be more easily seen and therefore more easily put into the type of pottery they are.
The day was spent at King’s Manor going over environmental samples.
The morning was spent going through petri dishes and sorting material through material which had been environmentally sampled from the Malton excavation and had been through the process of floatation and sieving.
The material was sorted into all sorts of categories from CBM (building material), bone, seeds, plant remains, shell, slag, charcoal and rock. As this material had been sieved through 1mm mesh the material was extremely tiny and therefore required the use of a microscope.
Whilst going through the material I did find an unusual piece of material which was like a small link of a chain as it was a piece of round material with a hole in the centre.
This could be a link in a chain, a tiny bead or an extremely unusual rock. However, due to the size of the piece of material, being smaller than 1mm, I think it is unlikely to be from a chain as it would have had to been an extremely delicate chain.
The afternoon was spent doing the process which leads up to the material being sorted. Therefore the afternoon was spent putting environmental samples through the process of floatation. This is the process where the bags or buckets of dirt which were collected from site are placed in a floatation tank and water is pumped into the tank. Any material which is light and floats runs of from the tank onto a 1mm sieve. Material which is heavy sinks to the bottom. Surrounding the tank is a set of mesh and therefore the mud and dirt from the bag or bucket slip through the mesh and to the very bottom of the bag.
The material which has sunk to the bottom but has not fallen through the mesh is then taken out and dried out to get the material which is sorted through.
The interpretation of Remus’ uniform as part of the Roman army consists of; a shield, armour and helmet.
The shield Remus was given is quite tall and is curved as per the design of a shield carried by a legionary (1. Pg.3.). By the design of the shield being curved it offered more protection than a flat shield as it covered more of the body and came closer to the body. Thus, making it harder to be harmed from the sides unlike a flat shield which would leave the sides open to attack. Also, due to design these shields could easily be positioned in a defence position with others to form a defence system which is difficult to be done with circular shields. Due to the size and weight of the shield it would make it hard to hold weaponry and therefore the shield was usually paired with a javelin or short sword (1. Pg.3.).
The armour Remus is wearing covers his chest with a red
tunic underneath as the metal in which the armour was made out was heavy (2)
and therefore the extra layer provided by the tunic would add comfort from the
heavy armour which protected them. As the Roman army in the Ancient World was
the biggest army (2) the sheer number of soldiers who required armour would
have extremely high and therefore the armour could have been designed to cover
the main weakness of a person which is their chest. Extra armour for the rest
of the body would have also weighed the soldier down even more and would have
cost the army even more and therefore the armour would have been designed to
cover the main weakness.
The helmet, galea, Remus is wearing offered protection to cheeks and neck (2). Thus, protecting the back of the neck from harm and also part of the face unlike a full helmet which would have covered the entire head and weighed even more. By having a helmet like this it offered protection for the majority of the head it also meant that they could be made in batches keeping the cost down for the army. The helmet Remus is wearing is likely to have been a ceremonial helmet due to the crest on top which would have been made out of horsehair (2). This could have been added on by Remus himself.
(1)- Sabin, P. (2000). The Face of Roman Battle. The Journal of Roman Studies, 90, 1-17.
When the drain was first found in our trench it was cut in half by an antiquarian trench, around 1800s to 1900s, and the end of the trench seemed to go into a ditch. However, the drain seemed to just disappear as the capping stones just ended and no walls of the drain were visible after the last visible capping stone.
Another issue which also occurred with this side of the drain to the left of the antiquarian trench, same part of the drain as the picture above, is that when we came to remove one of the capping stones to excavate the drain fill the sides of the drain were not visible and were not found during the excavation of the drain fill.
The capping stones were designed to sit on top of the sides of the drain and could easily be removed in order to maintain the drain and get rid of any blockages which would occur yet under the capping stone we decided to remove there was no indication of said walls. However, in the same length of drain we had found sides of the drain in an area where no capping stone was covering the drain.
It could be possible that the drain walls were removed at some point as the other side of the drain, to the right of the antiquarian trench, was missing numerous capping stones and therefore the drain could have been taken partly apart after it was no longer in use.
Another possible answer is that the drain was not maintained properly while in use and therefore became to the state as above due to the lack of proper care of it.
Another problem which occurred while excavating the part of the drain to the right of the antiquarian trench was that whilst removing the drain fill we were unable to the find the bottom of the drain. Usually as the ground is permeable in order to make sure water flows through a drain the bottom is also made out of the same material as the rest of the drain. However, during the entire excavation of the drain no bottom was found at all. This could suggest that the drain was poorly made or that it may not be a drain at all but due to its linear design it is a deliberate feature.
Due to our trench never having been excavated before we didn’t get as deep into the archaeology as trenches which have been opened in the previous years. Therefore the finds which were found in our trench came from the archaeology closer to the topsoil and not as deep down as other trenches.
Whilst on excavation we found some of the usual stuff which is usually found in any field. These being pieces of clay pipes, sherds of pottery and small pieces of animal bones. Pieces of clay pipes are quite common in any field as they would have been discarded by the farm hands in the past when they broke whilst they were working on the land. Their frequency is also increased due to the amount of years pipes were popular means of smoking. Sherds of pottery and small pieces of animal bones are also common due to manuring practices in which broken pieces of objects or bone are also placed on the field.
However, we did find a few things which may have been from the Roman period such as one or two coins and a metal horseshoe. Coins are also quite often found due to them being made out of metal which makes them durable even if they start to corrode in the ground due to the minerals in the soil. The coins found may have been accidentally dropped and just not picked up or they could have been left behind if the area was abandoned. However, due to the settlement being there for quite a long period it is most likely that the coins which were found were likely to have been dropped and just not picked up.
The metal horseshoe may be from the roman period as it was found within a structure which is thought to have been Roman. However, the purpose of the said horseshoe is difficult to understand as it is extremely small and unlikely to have been placed on a horse so young and therefore could have been a decorative piece in the structure as it was found close to the wall of a structure. It could have also been used as part of a game set such as the horseshoe toss in which the horseshoe is thrown at a stick in the ground and the aim is to get the horseshoe around the stick.
We also found a sherd of Samian ware which is from the roman period as Samian ware was only created during this period. It is also known that Samian ware was imported from Gaul, modern day France, and therefore was quite expensive. Due to this type of ware being expensive it was likely only to be used during special occasions or as a display piece as they are usually decorated which this sherd was.